6.++Overall+Quality

For the literature review, complete the following analysis: Comments & reflections: The unorthodox format of this literature review hindered our ability to analyze in the traditional sense. More research may be apparent in other sections, however, if this holds true, the dissertation shows value for practitioners in the field.
 * __Analysis 6: Overall Quality__**
 * **Category** || ** Criterion ** || **Score** || **Comments** ||
 * Coverage || Inclusion & exclusion || 1 || Not included ||
 * Synthesis || Done & not done || 2 || Identifies a gap but not critically examined ||
 * || Broader literature || 1 || Limited authoritative resources ||
 * || History || 1 || History of topic not discussed ||
 * || Key vocabulary || 2 || Defined but not discussed ambiguities ||
 * || Variables & phenomena || 1 || No inconsistencies are analyzed ||
 * || Synthesis & perspective || 2 || Some critique provided ||
 * Methodology || Critiqued methods || 1 || Research methods not discussed ||
 * || Methods & theory || 2 || Some discussion ||
 * Significance || Practical || 2 || Practical significance discussed, author's goal to examine actual practice. ||
 * || Scholarly || 1 || Scholarly significance of research not discussed. ||
 * Rhetoric || Coherent, structured || 2 || Some coherent structure ||